People from marginalized groups can increase their chances of getting career help when they explicitly mention their demographic identity in written requests for support, according to a new study from Wharton experts.
The study, which was published last month in Nature Human Behaviour, is a departure from previous research that finds minorities are more likely to face discrimination if decision-makers can figure out their identities through inadvertent cues, like an ethnic-sounding name on a resume. Many minority job-seekers deliberately scrub their CVs of any hints about their identities in order to avoid such bias.
But the study suggests that women and minorities may want to spell out their underrepresented status rather than softening it. Across three experiments, the researchers found a significantly higher response rate for emails that clearly stated identity in requests for help, such as “As a Black man in tech…”
The researchers believe that when a marginalized identity is made explicit, prospective helpers are motivated by a desire to avoid feeling or appearing prejudiced. In other words, they want to prove to themselves and to others that they do not discriminate.
“At a more abstract level, I think an important takeaway is that people can avoid discriminating when they are made aware that their behavior may be influenced by bias,” said Erika L. Kirgios, a Wharton doctoral candidate who is lead author on the study.
A request for help that contains specific identity language — for example, “As a Black woman working in technology, I’m hoping to get your advice” — signals the recipient to think carefully about bias and consider how to counteract it in their response.
“They want to feel like they are good people,” Kirgios said of prospective helpers. “In the U.S., we have for decades now equated being sexist or being racist with being a bad person. You don’t want to think of yourself that way. You don’t want to believe you’re a bad person. You want to believe you would treat people fairly.”
The study co-authors are Aneesh Rai, a Wharton doctoral candidate; Edward H. Chang, a business administration assistant professor at Harvard Business School; and Katy Milkman, a Wharton professor of operations, information, and decisions. Kirgios said the idea behind the study came from a conversation she had with Milkman about an email from an undergraduate seeking research opportunities. The student wrote that she was Latina from a low-income background. Kirgios and Milkman began debating whether such a disclosure would help or hurt someone’s chances of getting what they wanted.
“Katy’s hypothesis was that mentioning identity would work only when you contact someone who also shares your identity. I thought it would always work, no matter the recipient’s identity. As soon as we disagreed, we knew we had something,” Kirgios recalled.
The scholars conducted the following three experiments to test their hypotheses:

- Nearly 2,500 white male city council members from across the U.S. were sent emails from a fictitious student requesting career help. The letters randomly identified the student as a white male or a minority, either explicitly or not. Across the four categories, city council members were 24.4% more likely to respond when women and racial minorities explicitly stated their identity.
- Nearly 1,200 diverse undergraduate students at an East Coast university were sent emails requesting research help from a fictitious student named Demarcus Rivers, a name chosen to signal his identity. Students were randomly assigned to read letters that either included specific mention of Demarcus’ race (“As a Black man pursuing a PhD…”) or no mention (“As someone pursuing a PhD…”). The undergrads were 79.6% more likely to help Demarcus when he mentioned his race.
- Nearly 1,500 participants, who were recruited online, were asked to imagine being a computer science professor tasked with choosing one of four students to refer for a prestigious conference. Participants read application emails from the four candidates, one of whom was the Black man. The email from the Black male student either explicitly referred to his identity or simply signaled it via his name. Participants were 50% more likely to refer the Black man when he explicitly mentioned his identity.